ArticlePhysiology & behavior2025
To play or not to play? Effects of social isolation length and stimulus rat familiarity on social play engagement in three laboratory rat strains.
Article in Physiology & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Partner Choice and Context-Dependent Sex Differences in Rat Rough-and-Tumble Play.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social play is displayed by juveniles of many mammalian species and is vital to the development of social skills as shown in humans and rats. Here, we determined how two external conditions, social isolation length and social stimulus familiarity, modulate social play levels (by the experimental animals) and social play defense tactics (by the stimulus animals) in juveniles of three common laboratory rat strains: Long-Evans, Sprague-Dawley, and Wistar. Experimental rats were socially isolated for either 2 h or 48 h and were then exposed in their home cage to a familiar (cage mate) or novel sex-, age-, and strain-matched stimulus rat. We found that Long-Evans rats played more with familiar than with novel rats, irrespective of time isolated, Sprague-Dawley rats played the most in the 48h-Familiar condition, and Wistar rats played the least in the 2h-Familiar condition. Moreover, Wistar rats played more with novel rats than Long-Evans and Sprague-Dawley rats. Among the defense tactics analyzed, Long-Evans and Sprague-Dawley stimulus rats showed more counter nape attacks with familiar than with novel rats, Sprague-Dawley stimulus rats also showed more counter nape attacks after a 2 h versus 48 h isolation while Wistar rats showed more counter nape attacks after a 48 h versus 2 h isolation. The effects of the external conditions on social play levels and defense tactics were similar across sex for the three strains. Overall, more social play and more counter nape attacks were observed with a familiar playmate in Long-Evans rats, with a familiar playmate and 48 h isolation (social play) or 2 h isolation (counter nape attacks) in Sprague-Dawley rats, and with a familiar or novel playmate after 48 h isolation in Wistar rats. Future research could determine whether strain differences in neuronal mechanisms underlie these condition-induced variations in social play engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.