Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40907531›Full record

Trial reportEndoscopy2026

Colon capsule endoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy in patients with colonic diverticulitis: a randomized controlled superiority trial on patient-reported outcomes.

Camilla Thorndal, Benedicte Schelde-Olesen, Lasse Kaalby, Ulrik Deding, Maja Mi Thygesen, Rene Depont, Lea Østergaard Hansen, Per Vadgaard Andersen, Gunnar Baatrup, Anastasios Koulaouzidis and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEquivalence TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Camilla ThorndalDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0000-8980-8599
Benedicte Schelde-OlesenDepartment of Sugery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Lasse KaalbyDepartment of Sugery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Ulrik DedingDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8263-2989
Maja Mi ThygesenDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Rene DepontDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Lea Østergaard HansenDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Per Vadgaard AndersenDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Gunnar BaatrupDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Anastasios KoulaouzidisDepartment of Gastroenterology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2248-489X
Thomas Bjørsum-MeyerDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5253-0802

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the Danish health care system, follow-up colonoscopy is standard after a colonic diverticulitis episode in order to exclude malignancy. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a diagnostic alternative to colonoscopy. This study compared patient-reported outcomes of CCE versus colonoscopy after diverticulitis episodes. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with computed tomography-verified diverticulitis from Odense University Hospital. Patients were randomized to either CCE or colonoscopy 4–6 weeks after discharge. The primary outcome was patient-reported experienced physical and mental discomfort related to the procedures. Secondary outcomes were expected physical and mental discomfort, examination preference, proportion of complete examinations, and frequency of polyps and colorectal cancer. Results: 159 patients were randomized, with 148 receiving their allocated intervention and 83 completing the questionnaires. Demographic data were comparable between the two groups. No adverse events were observed. Patients expected greater physical and mental discomfort with colonoscopy than with CCE. However, no significant difference was found in experienced physical and mental discomfort between CCE and colonoscopy. For hypothetical future events, 49% of patients would prefer CCE, 13% would prefer colonoscopy, and 38% did not know. Complete examinations were reported for 84% of CCEs and 92% of colonoscopies. No malignant lesions were found. Conclusions: CCE was a safe follow-up procedure after a diverticulitis episode. CCE was preferred to colonoscopy by most patients who reported their experience. No difference was observed regarding experienced physical and mental discomfort between the groups completing the questionnaires.

Indexed as

Capsule EndoscopyColonoscopyDiverticulitis, ColonicPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Preference

Identifiers

PMID40907531
PMCPMC13077564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.