Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40906977›Full record

Trial reportNeurology2025

Safety and Efficacy of Perispinal Etanercept for Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Vincent N Thijs, Geoffrey C Cloud, Nigel Gilchrist, Brooke Parsons, Forum Tilvawala, Jan Kee Ho, Lara Ruthnam, Vimal Stanislaus, Nikola Sprigg, Marion Walker and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Vincent N ThijsFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6614-8417
Geoffrey C CloudDepartment of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8365-6907
Nigel GilchristCGM Research Trust, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Brooke ParsonsFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia.
Forum TilvawalaDepartment of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.ORCID 0009-0007-1209-3880
Jan Kee HoDepartment of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Lara RuthnamDepartment of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-4526-3895
Vimal StanislausDepartment of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Nikola SpriggStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5871-8168
Marion WalkerFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom; and.
Philip M BathStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2734-5132
Leonid ChurilovMelbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9807-6606
Julie BernhardtFlorey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2787-8484

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesStroke is a leading cause of long-term disability. Etanercept, a competitive tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor, has been proposed as a potential treatment for post-stroke impairments when given through a perispinal subcutaneous injection. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of perispinal etanercept in patients with chronic stroke.

methodsThe Perispinal Etanercept for Stroke Outcomes Study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial conducted in 3 ambulatory research clinics in Australia and New Zealand. Eligible patients were aged between 18 and 70 years, had a stroke between 1 and 15 years before enrollment, had a modified Rankin Scale score of 2-5, and demonstrated reduced quality of life as assessed by the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of participants at day 28 with an improvement of 5 points or more on the SF-36v2 compared with baseline after a single injection of etanercept 25 mg or equivalent placebo. The primary safety outcome was the difference in the proportion over 28 days of serious adverse events after a single injection of etanercept 25 mg or equivalent placebo. The primary outcome and safety were analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. Participants were followed up 56 days after the first injection of perispinal etanercept.

resultsRecruitment ceased early because of lack of continued funding. We screened 147 participants, of whom 126 were enrolled and randomized (63 etanercept: 63 placebo; 48 [38%] female, median (interquartile range) age 54.5 (45.0-60.0) years, median time since stroke 3 years). The primary outcome of improvement occurred in 33 of 63 participants (53%) in the etanercept arm and 36 of 63 participants (58%) in the placebo arm (adjusted odds ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.40-1.67, standardized risk difference -5%, 95% CI -22% to 13%). The proportion of serious adverse events was similar in both treatment arms. DISCUSSION: Perispinal etanercept was safe, but we found no evidence of improvement in quality of life and other efficacy outcomes compared with placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: The trial was registered at anzctr.org.au (ACTRN12620001011976) on October 7, 2020. Patients were enrolled between November 4, 2020, and September 1, 2023. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that in patients with imaging-confirmed ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, perispinal etanercept (25 mg) injection does not improve the patients' quality of life 28 days after injection.

Indexed as

EtanerceptStrokeAdolescentAdultAgedChronic DiseaseDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultEtanercept

Identifiers

PMID40906977
PMCPMC12418806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.