Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40906841›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2025

Epithelial tension controls intestinal cell extrusion.

Daniel Krueger, Willem Kasper Spoelstra, Dirk Jan Mastebroek, Rutger N U Kok, Shanie Wu, Mike Nikolaev, Marie Bannier-Hélaouët, Nikolche Gjorevski, Matthias Lutolf, Johan van Es and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biophysics of lumen morphogenesis.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Tight junction structure, assembly and (dys)function.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Daniel Krueger *Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMC), Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1139-7755
Willem Kasper Spoelstra *AMOLF Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7940-0829
Dirk Jan MastebroekHubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMC), Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1015-1481
Rutger N U KokAMOLF Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6214-681X
Shanie WuHubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMC), Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0001-6102-2778
Mike NikolaevÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne/Institute of Human Biology, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5955-900X
Marie Bannier-HélaouëtHubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMC), Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0549-3903
Nikolche GjorevskiÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne/Institute of Human Biology, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8320-0443
Matthias LutolfÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne/Institute of Human Biology, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5898-305X
Johan van EsHubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMC), Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1338-7078
Jeroen van ZonAMOLF Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6021-2924
Sander J TansAMOLF Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7131-2568
Hans CleversHubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMC), Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3077-5582

Funding

Dutch Research Council 024.003.013Dutch Research Council 737.016.009Dutch Research Council OCENW.GROOT.2019.085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell extrusion is essential for homeostatic self-renewal of the intestinal epithelium. Extrusion is thought to be triggered by crowding-induced compression of cells at the intestinal villus tip. In this study, we found instead that a local "tug-of-war" competition between contractile cells regulated extrusion in the intestinal epithelium. We combined quantitative live microscopy, optogenetic induction of tissue tension, genetic perturbation of myosin II activity, and local disruption of the basal cortex in mouse intestines and intestinal organoids. These approaches revealed that a dynamic actomyosin network generates tension throughout the intestinal villi, including the villus tip region. Mechanically weak cells unable to maintain this tension underwent extrusion. Thus, epithelial barrier integrity depends on intercellular mechanics.

Indexed as

ActomyosinEpithelial CellsIntestinal MucosaAnimalsMiceMyosin Type IIOptogeneticsOrganoidsActomyosinMyosin Type II

Identifiers

PMID40906841
PMCPMC7618335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.