Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40906800›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Bouncing microdroplets on hydrophobic surfaces.

Jamie McLauchlan, Jim S Walker, Vatsal Sanjay, Maziyar Jalaal, Jonathan P Reid, Adam M Squires, Anton Souslov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jamie McLauchlanDepartment of Physics, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0008-5311-7217
Jim S WalkerSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, United Kingdom.
Vatsal SanjayCoMPhy Lab, Department of Physics, Durham University, Science Laboratories, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4293-6099
Maziyar JalaalVan der Waals-Zeeman Institute, Institute of Physics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1098XH, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5654-8505
Jonathan P ReidSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6022-1778
Adam M SquiresDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AX, United Kingdom.
Anton SouslovTCM Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0US, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7735-100X

Funding

UKRI | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/S023593/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intuitively, slow droplets stick to a surface and faster droplets splash or bounce. However, recent work suggests that on nonwetting surfaces, whether microdroplets stick or bounce depends only on their size and fluid properties, but not on the incoming velocity. Here, we show using theory and experiments that even poorly wetting surfaces have a velocity-dependent criterion for bouncing of aqueous droplets, which is as high as 6 m/s for diameters of 30 to 50 [Formula: see text]m on hydrophobic surfaces such as Teflon. We quantify this criterion by analyzing the interplay of dissipation, surface adhesion, and incoming kinetic energy, and describe a wealth of associated phenomena, including air bubbles and satellite droplets. Our results on inertial microdroplets elucidate fundamental processes crucial to aerosol science and technology.

Indexed as

aerosolsbouncingdepositiondropletmicrofluidics

Identifiers

PMID40906800
PMCPMC12435232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.