Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40906784›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Ten practical tips and tricks to improve the effectiveness of biological network alignment.

Giuseppe Agapito, Mario Cannataro, Pietro Cinaglia, Marianna Milano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giuseppe AgapitoDepartment of Law, Economics and Social Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2868-7732
Mario CannataroData Analytics Research Center, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Pietro CinagliaData Analytics Research Center, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2237-6984
Marianna MilanoData Analytics Research Center, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.

Funding

Next Generation EU - Italian NRRP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network alignment (NA) is a computational methodology employed to compare biological networks across different species or conditions. By identifying conserved structures, functions, and interactions, NA provides invaluable insights into shared biological processes, evolutionary relationships, and system-level behaviors. This manuscript presents a comprehensive overview of NA methodologies, including the importance of preprocessing network data, selecting suitable input formats, and understanding diverse network types such as attributed, temporal, and multilayer networks. Additionally, it explores key challenges such as seed nodes selection, algorithm configuration, and cross-species alignment, emphasizing the necessity of integrating functional annotations, sequence similarity, and network topology for biologically meaningful results. Various NA strategies, including Local and Global Network Alignment, are discussed alongside their respective advantages and limitations. Practical recommendations for effectively documenting and visualizing NA experiments are also provided, ensuring reproducibility and clarity in research. By leveraging diverse alignment tools and adopting best practices, researchers can unlock the potential of NA to advance our understanding of complex biological systems.

Indexed as

Computational BiologySequence AlignmentAlgorithmsAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID40906784
PMCPMC12410751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.