ArticlePloS one2025
YOLO-ED: An efficient lung cancer detection model based on improved YOLOv8.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anatomical-Contextual YOLOv8-YOLOv12 Framework for Pulmonary Nodule Detection in CT: Multi-Organ Learning and Cross-Dataset Validation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Tumor Characterization and Histological Subtype Classification in Lung Cancer Using CT Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- PD-YOLO: a high-precision detection network for fine-grained lung cancer and multi-scale pulmonary nodules in CT images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Adaptive collaborative feature fusion and shape-aware optimization for multi-scale chest lesion detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- FAD-YOLO: a lightweight feature-refined and task-aligned framework for AIS-MIA discrimination on pulmonary CT.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- An enhanced YOLOv10 architecture for high-sensitivity and high-specificity lung cancer detection.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, You Only Look Once (YOLO) models have gradually been applied to medical image object detection tasks due to their good scalability and excellent generalization performance, bringing new perspectives and approaches to this field. However, existing models overlook the impact of numerous consecutive convolutions and the sampling blur caused by bilinear interpolation, resulting in excessive computational costs and insufficient precision in object detection. To address these problems, we propose a YOLOv8-based model using Efficient modulation and dynamic upsampling (YOLO-ED) to detect lung cancer in CT images. Specifically, we incorporate two innovative modules, the Efficient Modulation module and the DySample module, into the YOLOv8 model. The Efficient Modulation module employs a weighted fusion strategy to extract features from input CT images, effectively reducing model parameters and computational overhead. Furthermore, the DySample module is designed to replace the conventional upsampling component in YOLO, thereby mitigating information loss when expanding feature maps. The dynamic bilinear interpolation introduced by this module increases random bias, which helps minimize errors in feature extraction. To validate the effectiveness of YOLO-ED, we compared it with baselines on the LUNG-PET-CT-DX lung cancer diagnosis dataset and the LUNA16 lung nodule dataset. The results show that YOLO-ED significantly improves precision and reduces computational cost on these two datasets, demonstrating its superiority in the detection of medical images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.