ArticlePloS one2025
Machine learning predictions of unplanned readmissions using electronic medical records: Predictor importance across medical and surgical patient populations.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hospital readmissions prolong patient suffering and increase healthcare expenditures. While several studies have attempted to develop prediction models to reduce readmissions, most have demonstrated modest predictive accuracy. To improve upon prior approaches, we conducted an overview of systematic reviews to identify the most relevant predictor variables, then subsequently developed machine learning models in a retrospective, multisite study across eight hospitals. The patient sample comprised 200,799 inpatient stays from eligible hospitalizations, based on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) definition of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. We constructed random forest models and evaluated out-of-sample performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) across different train-test splits. The hospital-wide sample was divided into medical and surgical cohorts to investigate predictor importance across different patient populations. The average AUC score was 0.78 ± 0.01 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]). Patients' diagnoses were the most important predictor variables (contributing 18.4% ± 0.15 to the model's decision, mean ± standard error [SE]), followed by nursing assessments (11.2% ± 0.04, mean ± SE) and procedural information (10.8% ± 0.09, mean ± SE). Comparing medical and surgical patients, we found that medications and prior healthcare use (e.g., prior emergency encounters) were more important in the medical compared with the surgical cohort, whereas procedural information and healthcare provider information (e.g., physician caseload) were more relevant in the surgical relative to the medical cohort. In conclusion, we have established the feasibility of using Swiss electronic medical record (EMR) data to accurately predict unplanned readmissions. The reported variable importances may guide future research and inform development of clinical decision support systems aimed at reducing readmissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.