ArticlePloS one2025
Data-driven identification of key predictors of uncontrolled hypertension: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uncontrolled hypertension (HTN) increases the risk of adverse health events. This study aimed to identify key predictors of uncontrolled HTN in 1,308 Mexican adults with a prior diagnosis of HTN who were undergoing pharmacological treatment. We utilized data from the 2022 National Health and Nutrition Survey and applied data-driven algorithms within an artificial intelligence framework to enhance predictive accuracy and interpretability. Specifically, we integrated Random Forest, XGBoost, LASSO regression, and SHAP analysis. Uncontrolled HTN was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 80 mmHg based on two readings. We applied LASSO regression to exclude unrelated factors and trained Random Forest and XGBoost algorithms to identify the most important predictors. The key contributors to model accuracy in Random Forest were years since HTN diagnosis (11.9), age (9.4), and source of medical care (4.6), while SHAP analysis in XGBoost further highlighted age (0.115) and source of medical care (0.065) as significant factors. When compared to a traditional logistic regression model, the data-driven approach demonstrated superior predictive performance, with Random Forest achieving an AUC of 0.75 (95% CI 0.72-0.77) versus logistic regression (AUC = 0.61, 95% CI 0.59-0.64). XGBoost exhibited lower predictive capacity (AUC = 0.54, 95% CI 0.49-0.60). These findings underscore the importance of age, duration since diagnosis, and source of medical care in predicting uncontrolled HTN. If replicated, this evidence can inform public health strategies to better target at-risk populations and optimize HTN management through data-driven interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.