ArticlePloS one2025
The optimization of electrochemical hydride generation technology for treating antimony-containing wastewater.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimony (Sb) is extensively utilized in industrial activities, but most of its compounds exhibit human toxicity and are classified as priority-controlled pollutants. Unlike traditional electrochemical methods that remove metallic pollutants via coagulation or precipitation, electrochemical hydride generation technology converts antimony (Sb) in wastewater into stibine gas (SbH3) for efficient removal. Furthermore, the generated SbH₃ can be decomposed thermally to partially recover metallic antimony. In synthetic wastewater treatment (Sb = 5 mg/L), the proton exchange membrane (Nafion117) electrolysis device achieved an antimony removal efficiency of 72.8 ± 2.2%, outperforming traditional cation-exchange membranes. This enhancement is attributed to the membrane's proton-selective transport and high H conductivity. Increasing the temperature enhanced the generation and release of SbH3, with the higher removal efficiency of 87.3 ± 2.6% achieved at approximately 30 °C. However, temperatures exceeding 30 °C could lead to the partial decomposition of SbH3 back into the solution, thereby affecting removal efficiency. Ultrasonic stirring in the cathode chamber significantly enhanced Sb removal from high-concentration solutions (5 mg/L), while magnetic stirring was more suitable for lower-concentration solutions. Orthogonal experiments revealed that due to the competitive relationship between hydrogen generation and SbH3 generation, as well as the gas-blocking effect, current intensity and electrode area both had a significant impact on Sb removal. Under appropriate current intensity and electrode area conditions (0.5 A, 20 cm²), a high removal rate of 78.5 ± 4.6% can be achieved. Consequently, employing a Nafion membrane coupled with ultrasonic agitation under optimized conditions (30°C, 25 mA/cm²) effectively accelerates antimony removal kinetics and enhances elimination efficiency. However, the substantial reduction in current efficiency and elevated energy consumption induced by competitive hydrogen evolution represent critical challenges requiring urgent resolution. This treatment approach provides a technical reference for shifting from mere contaminant removal to resource recovery. The integration of removal and recovery processes holds substantial potential for implementing circular economy models in mining and metallurgical industries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.