ArticleThe New phytologist2025
Arabidopsis root defense barriers support beneficial interactions with rhizobacterium Pseudomonas simiae WCS417.
Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sulfur as a central integrator of plant-microbe interactions: from nutrient cycling to immune signalling and microbiome assembly.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- The plant holobiont: integrating molecular priming and ecological legacies for climate-adaptive immunity.Essays in biochemistry · 2026Review
- Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganisms Mediate Plant Metabolic Reprogramming to Manage the Rhizospheric Microbiome.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Microbiome modulation for sustainable crop production and climate resilience.Sustainable microbiology · 2026Review
- Differential Assembly of Rhizosphere Microbiome and Metabolome in Rice with Contrasting Resistance to Blast Disease.Microorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant roots interact with pathogenic and beneficial microbes in the soil. While root defense barriers block pathogens, their roles in facilitating beneficial plant-microbe associations are understudied. Here, we examined the impact of specific root defense barriers on the well-known beneficial association between Arabidopsis thaliana and the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas simiae WCS417. Using 15 Arabidopsis mutants with alterations in structural (cutin, suberin, callose, and lignin) and chemical (camalexin and glucosinolates) defense barriers, we demonstrate that some barriers impact WCS417-mediated plant growth responses and its root colonization. Root exudates from Arabidopsis wild-type (WT) and mutant plants differentially affected the WCS417 transcriptome, with camalexin notably impacting bacterial motility and chemotaxis, which was also confirmed by in vitro studies. On the plant side, WCS417-induced transcriptome changes in the roots of defense barrier mutants were significantly different from those in WT plants, particularly affecting growth and defense-related processes. Specifically, the data indicated altered activity of reactive oxygen species in several of the defense barrier mutants, which was confirmed in planta. Our data suggest that various root defense barriers play a role in balancing growth and defense during this mutualistic interaction, thereby impacting the establishment and effectiveness of plant mutualists, extending their established role in disease resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.