Observational studyComplementary medicine research2025
St John's Wort (
Observational study in Complementary medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyperforin as a Multifunctional Specialized Metabolite of Natural Origin for Chronic Diseases: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Metabolomic Profile of Aqueous Extracts of Commercial Samples of St John's Wort (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Wild Flora Species from Romania with Anxiolytic and Antidepressant Potential: A Global Perspective-Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2026
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHigh-dose dry extract preparations of St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) (hd-SJW) are equally effective as synthetic antidepressants (SAD) for mild to moderate depression as shown by various randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Other available preparations of SJW such as fresh plant tinctures are dosed lower and no clinical study about their effect has been published so far. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a SJW fresh plant tincture (C-SJW-ft) on depressive symptoms and its tolerability in patients comparable to patients reported in hd-SJW RCTs applying the same outcome, the Hamilton Depression Scale 17 (HAM-D 17).
methodsProspective observational study of outpatients with mild to moderate depressive episodes (ICD-10/DSM-IV) treated with C-SJW-ft. Outcomes were HAM-D 17 change from inclusion to 6 weeks (42 days ± 7 days), percentage of responders (>50% decline), and frequency and type of adverse events. Descriptive analysis was performed. From a systematic literature review of RCTs of hd-SJW applying HAM-D 17 as efficacy outcome at 6 weeks, the characteristics of the included patient population and the outcomes were extracted for comparison (rRCTs ["reference RCTs"]).
resultsFifty-two evaluable patients were included, 1 patient dropped out (switch to SADs). Of the 51 (per protocol [PP] "expanded") patients, 42 completed the second HAM-D 17 within 42 ± 7 days (PP "strict"). The included patient population was comparable to the 10 identified rRCTs with hd-SJW for age (51/50.6 years [mean, pp strict/pp expanded], 40.2-51.4 years [mean, rRCTs] and gender (76%/75% female [pp strict/pp expanded], 54-86% [rRCTs]). The baseline HAM-D 17 was slightly lower (PP strict: 16.4 [mean, range 9-28]; PP expanded 16.9 [9-28) compared to rRCTs (19.7-22.8). The decline of HAM-D 17 in patients treated with C-SJW-ft (baseline/end of observation period) was 49% (PP strict) and 52% (PP expanded) comparable to the decline of 45-59% in the rRCTs of hd-SJW; likewise, responders were 50% and 57% compared to 42-70%. Adverse events were lower (4%) compared to 20-39% in the rRCTs.
conclusionIn an observational prospective patient cohort with mild to moderate depressive episodes corresponding to patients included in RCTs of hd-SJW, applying the same efficacy outcome and timeframe, C-SJW-ft showed comparable effects and good tolerability. Further clinical trials seem justified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.