ArticleBiology2025
Deciphering the Gene Expression and Alternative Splicing Basis of Muscle Development Through Interpretable Machine Learning Models.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From machine learning to digital twin integration for livestock production and research.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Integrating multi-omics and machine learning to explore the role of amino acid metabolism in intervertebral disk degeneration.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In chickens, meat yield is a crucial trait in breeding programs. Identifying key molecular markers associated with increased muscle yield is essential for breeding strategies. This study applied transcriptome sequencing and machine learning methods to examine gene expression and alternative splicing (AS) events in muscle tissues of commercial broilers and local chickens. On the basis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially spliced transcripts (DSTs) significantly related to breast muscle weight percentage (BrP), high-accuracy prediction models were developed by evaluating 10 machine learning models (e.g., eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Generalized Linear Model Network (Glmnet)). Feature importance was assessed using the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method. The results revealed that 50 DEGs and 95 DSTs contributed significantly to BrP prediction. The XGBoost model achieved over 90% accuracy when using DEGs, and the Glmnet model reached 95% accuracy when using DSTs. Through Shapley evaluation, genes and AS events (e.g., ENSGALG00010012060, HINTW, and VIPR2-201) were identified as having the highest contributions to BrP prediction. Additionally, the breed effect was effectively mitigated. This study introduces new candidate genes and AS targets for the molecular breeding of poultry breast muscle traits, offering a paradigm shift from traditional gene mining approaches to artificial intelligence-driven predictive methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.