ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2025
Gpu-accelerated JEMRIS for extensive MRI simulations.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MRSeqStudio: MRI Sequence Design and Simulation as a Service in a Free and Open-Source Web Platform.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo enable accelerated Bloch simulations by enhancing the open-source multi-purpose MRI simulation tool JEMRIS with graphic processing units (GPU) parallelization.
methodsA GPU-compatible version of JEMRIS was built by shifting the computationally expensive parallelizable processes to the GPU to benefit from heterogeneous computing and by adding asynchronous communication and mixed precision support. With key classes reimplemented in CUDA C++, the developed GPU-JEMRIS framework was tested on simulations of common MRI artifacts in numerical phantoms. The accuracy and performance of the GPU-parallelized JEMRIS simulator were benchmarked against the CPU-parallelized JEMRIS and GPU-enabled KomaMRI.jl simulators. Additionally, an example of liver fat quantification errors due to respiratory motion artifacts was simulated in a multi-echo gradient echo (MEGRE) acquisition.
resultsThe GPU-accelerated JEMRIS achieved speed-up factors 3-12 and 7-65 using double and single precision numerical integrators, respectively, when compared to the parallelized CPU implementation in the investigated numerical phantom scenarios. While double precision GPU simulations negligibly differ (<0.1% NRMSE) from double precision CPU simulations, the single precision simulations still present small errors of up to 1% k-space signal NRMSE. The developed a GPU extension enabled computationally demanding motion simulations with a multi-species abdominal phantom and a MEGRE sequence, showing significant and spatially varying fat fraction bias in the presence of motion.
conclusionBy solving the Bloch equations in parallel on device, accelerated Bloch simulations can be performed on any GPU-equipped device with CUDA support using the developed GPU-JEMRIS. This would enable further insights into more realistic large spin pool MR simulations such as experiments with large multi-dimensional phantoms, multiple chemical species and dynamic effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.