ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2025
Optimizing Nutrition in Extremely Low Gestational Age Neonates: An Evidence-Based Protocol.
Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lactic Acid Bacteria-derived Bacteriocins: A Promising Antimicrobial Strategy against Multidrug-resistant for Neonatal Sepsis Pathogens.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- From Surviving to Thriving: A Protocol-Driven Approach to ELGAN Care.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Impact of Tele-Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) Clinics on the Respiratory Outcomes of Newborns: Authors' Reply 2.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Impact of Tele-Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) Clinics on the Respiratory Outcomes of Newborns: Correspondence 2.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Impact of Tele-Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) Clinics on the Respiratory Outcomes of Newborns: Authors' Reply 3.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Impact of Tele-Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) Clinics on the Respiratory Outcomes of Newborns: Correspondence 3.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Impact of Tele-Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) Clinics on the Respiratory Outcomes of Newborns: Authors' Reply.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the principles of enteral and parenteral nutrition practices is critical for improving the short- and long-term outcomes of extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGANs). An immature intestinal epithelium predisposes ELGANs to a significantly higher incidence of feed intolerance and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). While evidence-based guidelines for nutritional management in preterm neonates are available, their extrapolation to ELGANs may not be appropriate, given the lack of robust evidence in this latter group. This review discusses the evidence for parenteral nutrition practices, feeding initiation and advancement, monitoring for feed intolerance, NEC prevention strategies, probiotics, multi-nutrient fortification, and growth monitoring of ELGANs. The authors suggest starting minimal enteral feeds on day 1, advancing by 20–30 mL/kg/d, and adding multi-nutrient fortification once 100 mL/kg/d is tolerated. When enteral feeds are not possible, parenteral nutrition should be initiated early. The routine use of abdominal girth, gastric residuals, and glycerine enemas during feed advancement is not recommended. The authors suggest using probiotics cautiously only in growth-restricted ELGANs with antenatal Doppler abnormalities. Growth monitoring in ELGANs is critical, and an individualized approach is recommended depending on the intrauterine growth status, co-morbidities, and growth potential of a neonate, to prevent the consequences of undernutrition and excessive growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40906282What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.