ReviewJournal of molecular evolution2025
Codon Usage Evolution in Viruses: Implications for Survival and Pathogenicity.
Review in Journal of molecular evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selection profiles in RNA viruses reflect the characteristics of viruses more than individual proteins.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Evolution and Functional Implications of Codon Usage Bias in Eukaryotes.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Review
- Codon usage of human DNA viruses and its similarity to certain host genes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Translational regulation of human papillomavirus mRNAs in carcinogenesis: old questions and new insights.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Codon usage serves as a fundamental viral signature, influencing survival, adaptation, and pathogenicity. Viruses exhibit distinct codon usage patterns shaped by genome composition, host interactions, and evolutionary pressures. The differences between DNA and RNA viruses in codon usage reflect their replication strategies, host preferences, and genome constraints. Viral adaptation to host codon usage, genome size, and lifestyle further shapes translational efficiency and immune evasion mechanisms. Host tRNA abundance plays a crucial role in viral translation rates, while codon deoptimization is a strategy used by viruses to evade immune detection. Additionally, codon bias is linked to viral virulence, replication rates, and pathogenicity. Building on these concepts, this review synthesizes current knowledge on the interplay between virus-host translational interactions, codon bias-driven viral evolution, and their implications for pathogenesis, immune evasion, and epidemiology, while also outlining their practical applications in vaccine development, antiviral strategies, and viral diagnostics. We discuss current challenges in codon usage studies, including context-dependent variations and limited experimental validation, and propose future research directions that integrate computational and experimental approaches to deepen our understanding of viral codon bias and its role in evolution, host adaptation, and disease control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40906273What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.