Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40906244›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2026

Individual Preference for Fecal Immunochemical Test Options among Younger Adults: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Kailu Wang, Ho-Man Shum, Carrie Ho-Kwan Yam, Shangfeng Tang, Chunyan Li, Yushan Wu, Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, Eng-Kiong Yeoh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kailu WangCentre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. kailuwang@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3462-4677
Ho-Man ShumCentre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Carrie Ho-Kwan YamCentre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Shangfeng TangSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Chunyan LiTokyo College, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yushan WuCentre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Eliza Lai-Yi WongCentre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Eng-Kiong YeohCentre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to quantify the preference of adults below 50 years of age for fecal immunochemical test (FIT) options as screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) and its disparities across different subgroups.

methodsA discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted among adults aged < 50 years old in Hong Kong. A mixed logit model and latent class model were used to estimate their preference, taking into account their preference heterogeneity. Marginal willingness-to-pay for changes in the attribute levels was also estimated.

resultsA total of 408 participants with valid responses were included for analysis. The outcomes showed 5.2% of participants would consistently reject all the 20 FIT alternatives presented to them in the DCE survey. Mortality reduction in FIT programs was deemed as the most important attribute, followed by testing frequency, early detection likelihood, familiar physician, and reduction of false positive rate. The FIT acceptance was sensitive to the change of out-of-pocket payment amount. The latent class model showed participants with different ages, educational level, and self-reported health status would have different preferences for FIT attribute levels.

conclusionsThe study showed that most adults below 50 years old would be willing to consider receiving FIT if suitable testing options are available. They are more sensitive to changes in mortality reduction than changes in CRC early detection likelihood, suggesting the former is more important in information dissemination. The impact of out-of-pocket payments for FIT on its acceptance suggests that the introduction of financial subsidies can be considered to improve screening acceptance. The preference heterogeneity highlights the importance of healthcare professionals' understanding of people's values and preferences for decision-making.

Identifiers

PMID40906244
PMCPMC12796079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.