ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo analyze prognostic factors and survival outcomes in patients with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) to guide clinical management.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with SEOC at Peking University People's Hospital between January 2004 and December 2024. Clinicopathological data were collected, and oncological outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were analyzed along with their associated prognostic factors.
resultsAmong 64 included patients, vaginal bleeding was the predominant presenting symptom. Thirty-six patients were diagnosed with concordant endometrioid carcinoma, which was the most common histological type. All patients underwent surgical treatment, among whom 56 received platinum-based chemotherapy postoperatively, with a platinum sensitivity rate of 67.9%. The median PFS and OS were 27 months (range 3-215) and 41 months (range 7-246), respectively. On multivariate analysis, advanced FIGO stage of ovarian cancer (HR = 2.764; 95% CI 1.169-6.536, P = 0.021) independently predicted worse PFS, while platinum resistance (HR = 6.962; 95% CI 2.052-23.619, P = 0.002) was significantly associated with reduced OS.
conclusionsIn this cohort, platinum sensitivity was observed in 67.9% of cases. The advanced ovarian FIGO stage and platinum resistance independently correlated with inferior survival, underscoring the urgent need for tailored therapeutic strategies and intensified surveillance in platinum-resistant SEOC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.