Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40906122›Full record

ArticleBiology2025

Assessment of Grassland Carrying Capacity and Grass-Livestock Balance in the Three River Headwaters Region Under Different Scenarios.

Wenjing Li, Qiong Luo, Zhe Chen, Yanlin Liu, Zhouyuan Li, Wenying Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenjing LiCollege of Geography Science, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China.
Qiong LuoCollege of Life Sciences, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China.
Zhe ChenCollege of Life Sciences, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8156-5358
Yanlin LiuCollege of Life Sciences, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China.
Zhouyuan LiSchool of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2830-4076
Wenying WangCollege of Geography Science, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China.

Funding

the National Key R&D Program of China and 111Project 2023YFF1304305 and D23029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is crucial to clarify the grassland carrying capacity (CC) and the balance between grass and livestock under different scenarios for ecological protection and sustainable development in the Three River Headwaters Region (TRHR). This study focused on the TRHR and used livestock data, MODIS Net Primary Productivity (NPP) data, and artificial supplementary feeding data to analyze grassland CC and explore changes in the grass-livestock balance across various scenarios. The results showed that the theoretical CC of edible forage under complete grazing conditions was much lower than that of crude protein under nutritional carrying conditions. Furthermore, without increasing the grazing intensity of natural grasslands, artificial supplementary feeding reduced overstocking areas by 21%. These results suggest that supplementary feeding effectively addresses the imbalance between forage supply and demand, serving as a key measure for achieving sustainable grassland livestock husbandry. Despite the effective mitigation of grassland degradation in the TRHR due to strict grass-livestock balance policies and ecological restoration projects, the actual livestock CC exceeded the theoretical capacity, leading to overgrazing in some areas. To achieve desired objectives, more effective grassland management strategies must be implemented in the future to minimize spatiotemporal conflicts between grasses and livestock and ensure the health and stability of grassland ecosystems.

Indexed as

artificial supplementary feedingcrude proteindifferent scenariosgrassland carrying capacitygrassland managementgrass–livestock balancesustainable development

Identifiers

PMID40906122
PMCPMC12383792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.