Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40906114›Full record

ArticleBiology2025

Succession of Weed Community on Wheat Lands in the Past 25 Years: A Case Study in Eastern China.

Guoqi Chen, Zeyue Huang, Jiahao Xue, Feng Zhu, Yang Chen, Yunfei Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guoqi ChenJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Research Institute of Rice Industrial Engineering Technology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Zeyue HuangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Research Institute of Rice Industrial Engineering Technology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Jiahao XueJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Research Institute of Rice Industrial Engineering Technology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Feng ZhuJiangsu Green Food Office, Nanjing 210036, China.
Yang ChenJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Research Institute of Rice Industrial Engineering Technology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Yunfei WuCollege of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.

Funding

Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund CX (24) 1026National Key R&D Program Projects 2021YFD1700100Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions PAPD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weeds represent increasingly troublesome threats to modern wheat production. Jiangsu Province, China, is one of the largest wheat-planting areas, characterized by a high level of agricultural mechanization, in the country. In 2024, we surveyed weed communities of 924 wheat lands from 308 sites in Jiangsu and compared them with historical data surveyed in 1999-2000 in this province. A total of 156 weed species belonging to 103 genera and 39 families were recorded. Compositae and Poaceae showed the highest species richness, with 26 and 23 species, respectively. Poaceae weeds accounted for 54.3% of the overall weeds in dominance values.

Indexed as

biological homogenizationbroadleaf weeddominancefield surveygrassy weedhistorical dataspecies richness

Identifiers

PMID40906114
PMCPMC12383366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.