Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40906059›Full record

ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2025

[Predictors of the appropriateness of first presentation in an university ophthalmology outpatient clinic: an analysis of sociodemographic factors].

L Malagutti, D Böhringer, T Reinhard

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

L MalaguttiKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Deutschland. luca.malagutti@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
D BöhringerKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Deutschland.
T ReinhardKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing shortage of specialists in ophthalmology and the rising burden on university eye clinics raise questions about the appropriateness of the utilization of university resources. This study investigates the relationship between various sociodemographic determinants, such as age or social status, and the appropriateness of first presentation in a university ophthalmology outpatient clinic.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using routine data from 182,170 patients of the university outpatient clinic at the University Medical Center Freiburg (2006-2023). The appropriateness of the first presentation was operationalized by a follow-up visit within 100 days. Social status was assessed using the social index of the City of Freiburg at the postal code level. The data analysis considered relevant covariates such as age, gender, type of consultation, insurance status, distance from residence, and the social index of Freiburg.

resultsOf the included patient visits, 42.7% were classified as appropriate. An older age (odds ratio (OR) 1.36 per standard deviation (SD), 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-1.37) was the strongest predictor of the appropriateness of the presentation. The social index showed a weaker but significant effect (OR 1.05 per SD, 95% CI: 1.02-1.07): a lower social status was associated with increased appropriateness. The distance from residence had no significant influence.

conclusionThe results indicate an association between increased urgency of care and both higher patient age and lower social status, with the latter potentially reflecting care gaps or delayed utilization. The study provides important insights for needs-based resource planning and health policy measures aimed at optimizing ophthalmological care structures.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAmbulatory Care FacilitiesOphthalmologyOutpatient Clinics, HospitalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesEmergency presentationFollow-up intervalResource planningSocial statusUrgency

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.