ReviewEndocrine pathology2025
Diagnostic Evaluation of Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma in Core Biopsy Specimens: Morphologic, Immunohistochemical, Molecular, and Therapeutic Considerations.
Review in Endocrine pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although a diagnosis of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) can be rendered on fine needle aspiration (FNA), a core needle biopsy is often performed to provide sufficient material for immunohistochemical and molecular analysis. Rendering an ATC diagnosis on core biopsy can be challenging due to limited material. It is crucial that other diagnostic entities in the differential, such as poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma, medullary thyroid carcinoma, lymphoma, metastases, and NUT carcinoma (among others), are considered and that immunohistochemistry (IHC) is employed judiciously to support the diagnosis. IHC for BRAF V600E should also be performed for ATC to expeditiously assess BRAF V600E mutation status because BRAF-targeted therapy is a critical treatment option for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant ATC. Molecular testing utilizing next-generation sequencing (NGS) should also be initiated at the time of an ATC diagnosis both to confirm BRAF V600E mutation status and to evaluate for other actionable alterations in BRAF-wild-type ATC (such and NTRK or RET fusions or mismatch repair deficiency) and to assess tumor mutation burden. Additionally, IHC for PD-L1 is increasingly being utilized given the results of studies demonstrating the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in some ATC patients with PD-L1 expression in tumor cells (especially when utilized along with BRAF inhibitors in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant ATC). In this review, the morphologic and immunophenotypic features of ATC are outlined, the differential diagnosis is reviewed, and the therapeutic implications of key biomarkers are highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40906053What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.