ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Integrating genomic and transcriptome features for characterization and prognostic prediction of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we conducted integrated molecular analyses of the transcriptome and tumor genome in 24 newly diagnosed patients with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL). Gene expression profiling revealed significant enrichment of B cell receptor signaling and innate immune-related pathways in the response group. CIBERSORT-based deconvolution analysis showed that the proportions of tumor-infiltrating B cells and M1 macrophages were significantly higher in the response group compared to the non-response group (B cells: 17.4% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.012; M1 macrophages: 11.3% vs. 6.1%, P = 0.005). The abundance of these immune cells was associated with favorable progression-free survival and overall survival. Conversely, T follicular helper (TFH) cells, which reflect tumor burden, were inversely correlated with these favorable immune subsets. The most frequently mutated genes in this cohort included TET2 (73.9%), RHOA (47.8%), IDH2 (34.7%), and DNMT3A (26.1%). Mutations in RHOA, IDH2, and DNMT3A were negatively correlated with tumor-infiltrating B cells and were associated with poorer survival outcomes. Furthermore, higher variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of TET2 mutations were also negatively correlated with B cell infiltration, while RHOA VAFs were positively associated with TFH cell abundance, suggesting a link between mutational clonality and immune suppression. In conclusion, our study highlights the interplay between tumor genetic alterations and the immune microenvironment in AITL. We identified a favorable immune profile, characterized by increased infiltration of B cells and M1 macrophages, that correlates with chemosensitivity and improved prognosis. In contrast, mutations in RHOA, IDH2, DNMT3A, and high VAFs of TET2 were associated with adverse clinical outcomes and unfavorable immune contexture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.