ArticleCell and tissue banking2025
Amniotic membrane extract provides significant improvement in in vitro wound healing model while preserving the basic cellular functions of human corneal epithelial cells.
Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although many preclinical and clinical studies are ongoing on amniotic membrane extract (AME), an amniotic membrane-derived product developed to support ocular surface healing, the effect of AME on the basic cellular functions and properties of human corneal epithelial cells (hCECs) has not been clearly defined. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of AME supplementation to the culture media, on basic cellular functions of hCECs and on expression of specific cell markers of hCECs, as well as to determine its effectiveness in an experimental in vitro wound model. hCECs were seeded with the constant cell density in 6, 24 and 48 well plates. The next day, the media was refreshed with 0 mg/ml, 0.75 mg/ml, 1.5 mg/ml and 3 mg/ml final concentration of AME supplemented complete growth medium. Cellular morphology, viability, metabolic activity, proliferation assessments and immunocytochemistry were conducted on the time points at day 3, 6 and 9. Then, in vitro wound healing assay was performed on hCECs under the effect of AME. AME did not affect cellular morphology, viability, metabolic activity and proliferation. AME supplementation induced CK3 and CK12 expression of hCECs significantly (p < 0.05) higher than without AME group. In vitro wound healing assay revealed that while control and AME-treated cultures both exhibited healing, AME-treated mechanical abrasions closed at a greater rate compared to control. Our study shows that AME promotes in vitro wound healing and cell characteristics in terms of CK3 and CK12 protein expressions, while preserving basic cellular functions of corneal epithelial cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40905991What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.