Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40905981›Full record

SynthesisNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026

A comprehensive systematic review of randomized controlled trials on anesthetic agents in children's upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: highlighting safety concerns and efficacy.

Amr Elrosasy, Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi, Mohamed Abo Zeid, Abdelaziz A Awad, Ahmed W Abbas, Mohammad Al Diab Al Azzawi, Eslam Afifi, Ahmed Amgad, Mohamed Yasser, Khalid Sarhan and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Median effective dose (EDBMC anesthesiology · 2026
    Trial
  2. The EDDrug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amr ElrosasyFaculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mahmoud Diaa HindawiFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. Mah19147686@azhar.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3085-6665
Mohamed Abo ZeidFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Abdelaziz A AwadFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed W AbbasMedical Research Group of Egypt, Negida Academy, Arlington, MA, USA.
Mohammad Al Diab Al AzzawiFaculty of Medicine, National Ribat University, Khartoum, Sudan.
Eslam AfifiMedical Research Group of Egypt, Negida Academy, Arlington, MA, USA.
Ahmed AmgadMedical Research Group of Egypt, Negida Academy, Arlington, MA, USA.
Mohamed YasserFaculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Khalid SarhanMedical Research Group of Egypt, Negida Academy, Arlington, MA, USA.
Sara Chikh AissaMedical Research Group of Egypt, Negida Academy, Arlington, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) is essential for diagnosing and treating gastrointestinal disorders in children aged 6-12 years, yet it often requires sedation due to the significant discomfort and pain involved. We conducted a PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Ovid (inception to March 30, 2024). Inclusion criteria are as follows: RCTs comparing sedative regimens (e.g., propofol, ketamine, remimazolam, dexmedetomidine) in children undergoing upper GIE. Exclusion criteria are as follows: non-RCTs, studies outside the age range, or non-English publications. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane ROB-2. Data were extracted for recovery time, hemodynamic parameters, and adverse events (hypoxia, bradycardia, dizziness). A systematic synthesis of outcomes was performed, with results presented descriptively and quantitatively (e.g., event rates, mean differences) to compare regimens. Nineteen RCTs were included with a total of 1955 patients. Propofol, either alone or in combination, was frequently used. The propofol-ketamine combination showed better hemodynamic stability (92.2 ± 16.8 bpm) compared to propofol-fentanyl (76.8 ± 13.8 bpm). S-ketamine demonstrated dose-dependent effects-0.3 mg/kg provided the shortest recovery time (33.5 min) with moderate dizziness (40.0%)-while 0.5 mg/kg offered optimal heart rate maintenance (93.81 bpm) but longer recovery (35.67 min) and increased dizziness (43.3%). The 0.7 mg/kg dose showed faster recovery than 0.5 mg/kg (33.5 vs 35.67 min), but the highest dizziness rates (73.3%). Post-procedural complications were minimal except for dose-dependent neurological effects with S-ketamine (visual disturbances peaking at 27.6% with 0.3 mg/kg). Remimazolam showed the fastest recovery overall. Adverse events varied by regimen: propofol-ketamine had higher hypoxia (6.8%) and dizziness (34.1%), while propofol-fentanyl showed more bradycardia (24.4%). Overall, remimazolam and dexmedetomidine regimens were linked to fewer complications, though they required careful monitoring for hypotension. However, heterogeneity in outcomes (e.g., recovery times, adverse events) underscores the need for individualized regimen selection. Limitations include variability in study designs and insufficient data on minimal effective doses. Further RCTs should standardize outcome measures and optimize dosing for children undergoing endoscopy.

Indexed as

AnestheticsEndoscopy, GastrointestinalHypnotics and SedativesChildHumansKetaminePropofolRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnestheticsHypnotics and SedativesKetaminePropofolPediatric gastrointestinal disordersPropofolRemimazolamSedationS-KetamineUpper gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE)

Identifiers

PMID40905981
PMCPMC12901073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.