Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40905951›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Discovering subnetworks in SBML models.

Joseph L Hellerstein, Lucian P Smith, Lillian T Tatka, Steven S Andrews, Michael A Kochen, Herbert M Sauro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph L HellersteineScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0802-4069
Lucian P SmithPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, United States.
Lillian T TatkaTalus Bioscience, Seattle, WA, 98122, United States.
Steven S AndrewsDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4576-8107
Michael A KochenSoftware Applications and Technology, Rocky Mountain Division, Applied Research Associates, Inc, Bentonville, AR, 72212, United States.
Herbert M SauroeScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3659-6817

Funding

TR&D3: Standards and Tools for Simulator Composition and Credibility portalP41EB023912 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Ion I. Moraru, HERBERT M. SAURO · 2018 to 2026
$11.4M
eScience Institute at the University of WashingtonNIBIBNIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB023912NIH HHSNIH HHS P41EB023912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMany advances in biomedical research are driven by structural analysis, which investigates interconnections between elements in biological systems (e.g. structural analysis of proteins to infer their function). Herein, we consider subnet discovery in chemical reaction networks (CRNs)-discovering a subset of a target CRN, i.e. structurally identical to a reference CRN. Structural analysis techniques such as motif finding and graph mining look for small, arbitrary, and commonly occurring substructures (e.g. three gene feedforward loops). In contrast, subnet discovery looks for larger, specific, and infrequently occurring substructures (e.g. 10 reactions mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway).

resultsWe introduce pySubnetSB, an open source Python package for discovering subnets in CRNs that are represented in the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) community standard. We show that pySubnetSB achieves large reductions in computational complexity for subnet discovery. For example, in studies of randomly selected target networks with 100 reactions each with a random reference network with 20 reactions, computations are reduced from an infeasible 1078 evaluations to a more practical 108 evaluations. We develop a methodology for assessing the statistical significance of subnet discovery. Last, we study subnets in BioModels for approximately 200 000 pairs of reference and target models. We show that for a reference MAPK pathway, subnet discovery correctly indicates the presence of MAPK function in several target models. The studies also suggest two interesting hypotheses: (a) the potential presence of hidden oscillators in several models in BioModels, and (b) the possibility of a conserved mechanism for intracellular immune response. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLENETATION: pySubnetSB is installed using pip install pySubnetSB, and is hosted at https://github.com/ModelEngineering/pySubnetSB/.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalProgramming LanguagesSoftwareSystems BiologyAlgorithms

Identifiers

PMID40905951
PMCPMC12478697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.