Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40905943›Full record

ReviewAnnals of botany2026

Repeated loss of plastid NDH during evolution of land plants.

Gitte Petersen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gitte PetersenDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm 106 91, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2325-0059

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in DNA sequencing technology have led to a rapid increase in the number of species with organelle genomes and even complete nuclear genomes being sequenced. Thousands of plastid genomes from across all major clades of land plants are now available, and one of the surprising findings is the recurring event of complete or functional loss of genes involved in cyclic electron transport during photosynthesis, i.e. the ndh genes that encode subunits of the chloroplast NADH dehydrogenase-like (NDH) complex. Gene loss in non-photosynthetic, heterotrophic plants might be expected, but the increasing number of losses being discovered in autotrophic plants calls into question the role and potential dispensability of the ndh genes and the entire NDH complex. SCOPE: With a focus on autotrophic plants, the present review compiles published evidence about the loss of both plastid and nuclear encoded NDH genes, providing an overview spanning all major clades of land plants. Current knowledge about the function of NDH and the possible reasons behind repeated loss are discussed.

conclusionsMore than 100 independent events of plastid ndh gene loss have been reported from autotrophic land plants, and strong evidence exists that these losses go hand in hand with the loss of nuclear encoded NDH genes. Although loss is almost inevitable in heterotrophic plants and common among carnivorous plants, it occurs in what appears to be a random manner among normal, autotrophic plants. No single underlying reason for the events of loss can be discerned, although a link to nutrient acquisition prevails. Even in autotrophic plants, the NDH complex might simply be dispensable owing to the existence of an alternative and major pathway of cyclic electron transport around photosystem I.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEmbryophytaEvolution, MolecularNADH DehydrogenasePlastidsPhylogenyNADH DehydrogenaseAutotrophic plantcarnivorous plantgene lossmycoheterotrophic plantNADH dehydrogenase-like complexparasitic plantphotosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID40905943
PMCPMC12784084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.