ReviewAnnals of botany2026
Repeated loss of plastid NDH during evolution of land plants.
Review in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vestigial Plastids in Parasitic Plants: Evolutionary Remnants or Adaptive Innovations?Plant, cell & environment · 2026Review
- Comprehensive species sampling reveals pervasive pseudogenization and recurrent complete loss of plastid ndh genes in the genus Cymbidium (Orchidaceae).BMC plant biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in DNA sequencing technology have led to a rapid increase in the number of species with organelle genomes and even complete nuclear genomes being sequenced. Thousands of plastid genomes from across all major clades of land plants are now available, and one of the surprising findings is the recurring event of complete or functional loss of genes involved in cyclic electron transport during photosynthesis, i.e. the ndh genes that encode subunits of the chloroplast NADH dehydrogenase-like (NDH) complex. Gene loss in non-photosynthetic, heterotrophic plants might be expected, but the increasing number of losses being discovered in autotrophic plants calls into question the role and potential dispensability of the ndh genes and the entire NDH complex. SCOPE: With a focus on autotrophic plants, the present review compiles published evidence about the loss of both plastid and nuclear encoded NDH genes, providing an overview spanning all major clades of land plants. Current knowledge about the function of NDH and the possible reasons behind repeated loss are discussed.
conclusionsMore than 100 independent events of plastid ndh gene loss have been reported from autotrophic land plants, and strong evidence exists that these losses go hand in hand with the loss of nuclear encoded NDH genes. Although loss is almost inevitable in heterotrophic plants and common among carnivorous plants, it occurs in what appears to be a random manner among normal, autotrophic plants. No single underlying reason for the events of loss can be discerned, although a link to nutrient acquisition prevails. Even in autotrophic plants, the NDH complex might simply be dispensable owing to the existence of an alternative and major pathway of cyclic electron transport around photosystem I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.