ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2026
Communication Surrounding Treatment Preferences for Older Adults With Dementia During Emergency Medical Services Response.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emergency Care Should Not Be Guesswork: Preparing Patients With Dementia Before 911 Is Dialed.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmergency Medical Services (EMS) providers, capable of rapidly delivering life-prolonging interventions, are often first to respond to acute health concerns for older adults in the United States. Prior work has shown a preference among many people with dementia for comfort-focused care near end-of-life. People with dementia frequently use EMS; however, little is known about communication surrounding treatment preferences during EMS response for this group.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative content analysis of EMS incident reports for older adults with dementia transported to two urban academic hospitals (2011-2021). We identified eligible patients in the hospital electronic health record applying the following criteria: age ≥ 65, diagnosis code indicating dementia, assessment by EMS, hospitalization between 2011 and 2021, and National Early Warning Score ≥ 7 indicating critical illness. We characterized the frequency and content of documented patient treatment preferences in EMS incident reports and identified barriers and facilitators to communication about treatment preferences or goal-concordant care.
resultsWe reviewed incident reports for 171 patients with a median age of 82 (IQR 12) years. About half (51%) of the patients were residing in nursing homes. A minority (23%) of the patients were described as able to communicate needs, and only 24% had a family member or friend present at the time of EMS assessment. Treatment preferences were mentioned in 27% of the reports. EMS providers documented barriers to communication or delivery of goal-concordant care in nursing home settings that included difficulty obtaining information from professional caregivers, receiving secondhand information, and variable role expectations. Goal-concordant care was facilitated in these settings when EMS providers spoke directly with patients' family members by telephone.
conclusionsEMS providers treating critically ill older adults with dementia face challenges that may hinder their ability to elicit treatment preferences, in particular when responding to calls from professional caregivers. Direct communication with surrogate decision-makers may facilitate goal-concordant care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.