ReviewEFORT open reviews2025
Exploring superior capsular reconstruction and tendon transfers for massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears.
Review in EFORT open reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Return to work and sports after posterior latissimus dorsi transfer for posterior superior irreparable rotator cuff tears.JSES international · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of long head of the biceps tendon augmentation versus partial repair in massive rotator cuff tears.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Clinical Retrospective Study on Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Autologous Fascia Lata Combined With LARS Ligament for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison of isolated tenotomy vs. tenotomy with tenodesis for long head of biceps tendon in middle-aged and elderly patients undergoing rotator cuff repair: a retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rotator cuff tears are prevalent, affecting 20% of the general population, with massive tears accounting for 40% of these cases. Massive tears, those larger than 5 cm or involving several tendons, pose substantial clinical problems, including poorer surgical outcomes and increased recurrence rates. Multiple classification systems offer varied definitions, complicating treatment strategies. The irreparability of these tears, exacerbated by conditions such as tendon atrophy and advanced imaging abnormalities, can further complicate management. Surgical options include superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and tendon transfers. SCR, which involves attaching a graft to the superior glenoid and greater tuberosity, has shown promise in individuals with intact subscapularis tendons and minimal arthritis. Graft alternatives include fascia lata (FL) autografts, human dermal allografts, and long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) autografts. Each graft type has distinct advantages and disadvantages, with FL autografts providing greater results despite donor site morbidity. Tendon transfers, such as latissimus dorsi and lower trapezius transfers, offer alternative treatments, especially for younger, more active individuals. This review thoroughly reviews different therapeutic options, emphasizing the most recent evidence and clinical outcomes to help guide the best management of massive posterosuperior irreparable rotator cuff injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.