ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2025
Investigating the role of the I-II linker in Nav1.5 channel function.
Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Common genetic variants of the cardiac sodium channel alter patient response to class 1b antiarrhythmics.Journal of precision medicine (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cardiac voltage-gated sodium channel, Nav1.5, initiates the cardiac action potential. Its dysfunction can lead to dangerous arrhythmias, sudden cardiac arrest, and death. The functional Nav1.5 core consists of four homologous repeats (I, II, III, and IV), each formed from a voltage sensing and a pore domain. The channel also contains three cytoplasmic linkers (I-II, II-III, and III-IV). While Nav1.5 structures have been published, the I-II and II-III linkers have remained absent, are predicted to be disordered, and their functional role is not well understood. We divided the I-II linker into eight regions ranging in size from 32 to 52 residues, chosen based on their distinct properties. Since these regions had unique sequence properties, we hypothesized that they may have distinct effects on channel function. We tested this hypothesis with experiments with individual Nav1.5 constructs with each region deleted. These deletions had small effects on channel gating, though two (430-457del and 556-607del) reduced peak current. Phylogenetic analysis of the I-II linker revealed five prolines (P627, P628, P637, P640, and P648) that were conserved in mammals but absent from the Xenopus sequence. We created mutant channels, where these were replaced with their Xenopus counterparts. The only mutation that had a significant effect on channel gating was P627S, which depolarized channel activation (10.13 ± 2.28 mV). Neither a phosphosilent (P627A) nor a phosphomimetic (P627E) mutation had a significant effect, suggesting that either phosphorylation or another specific serine property is required. Since deletion of large regions had little effect on channel gating while a point mutation had a conspicuous impact, the I-II linker role may be to facilitate interactions with other proteins. Variants may have a larger impact if they create or disrupt these interactions, which may be key in evaluating the pathogenicity of variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.