ReviewInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Worldwide research on 3D printing for cancer: a dual-method analysis of bibliometrics and stratified focused thematic.
Review in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deconstructing cancer in 3D: models, mechanisms, and personalized solutions.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- 3D Bioprinting for Tumor Microenvironment Reconstruction: Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- The trends and hotspots of gut microbiota for breast cancer from 2005 to 2024: A bibliometric and visual analysis.Medicine · 2026Review
- Letter to the Editor: Worldwide research on 3D printing for cancer: a dual-method analysis of bibliometrics and stratified focused thematic.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles on tissue expander use in breast reconstruction: insights from CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Biomimetic Phantoms in X-Ray-Based Radiotherapy Research: A Narrative Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study investigates the application of three-dimensional (3D) printing in cancer research and treatment, highlighting the current advancements, key areas of interest, and emerging trends in the field.
methodsLiterature records and cited references were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database and analyzed using Excel 2019, Bibliometrix, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace. Based on the scientometric results, a stratified and focused thematic analysis was performed by cancer type to enhance clinical relevance and investigate tumor-specific applications.
resultsA total of 2312 publications on 3D printing in cancer were identified, with the earliest published in 2006. Publications originated from 2740 institutions across 82 countries, with China leading the field with 779 articles. Sichuan University was the most prolific institution, publishing 75 articles. Frontiers in Oncology had the highest number of publications with 49 publications, while Biomaterials was the most frequently cited journal with 3354 citations. Contributions to the field have been made by 13 066 contributing authors, with Tu Chongqi having 39 publications being the most productive. Key research areas focus on utilizing 3D printing for preoperative planning and patient education in tumor surgery, treating malignant bone tumors, advancing tumor radiotherapy, constructing in vitro tumor cell models, and expanding 3D bioprinting applications in cancer therapy. Future directions may include developments in limb-salvage and prosthetic reconstruction, the use of 3D bioprinting tumor microenvironment (TME) models to investigate antitumor mechanisms, and applications of 3D printing in cancer drug resistance. Among the most frequently studied tumor types, research on malignant bone tumors has primarily focused on reconstruction and tissue regeneration. In breast cancer, key areas include surgical planning, radiotherapy bolus design, tumor microenvironment modeling, and drug delivery. Lung cancer studies have emphasized surgical simulation, imaging phantoms, and bioprinted tumor models, while cervical cancer research has concentrated on customized brachytherapy applicators and preclinical bioprinting platforms. Additional insights on liver, prostate, head and neck, colorectal cancers, and glioblastoma are provided in the supplementary tables to support targeted research efforts.
conclusionsThis study provides a comprehensive overview of the global applications of 3D printing in cancer research from 2000 to 2024, analyzing contributions from various countries, institutions, authors, and journals, as well as key topics, keywords, and references. By incorporating cancer-type-specific thematic analysis, the study not only identifies global research patterns and hotspots but also delineates the translational progress and unmet clinical needs across major tumor types. The findings highlight current research hotspots and emerging trends, offering valuable insights for future advancements in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.