ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Temporal Sensitivity Under Photopic and Scotopic Conditions Across the Cortical Visual Hierarchy.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Behavioral and electrophysiological studies have shown that vision is slower under scotopic conditions (dark, activating only rods) than photopic conditions (light, activating only cones). However, slower scotopic processing cannot be solely explained by findings that rod signals are slower than cone signals, and it is unknown whether temporal processing differences persist in cortex. Flickering stimuli have previously been used in functional MRI (fMRI) studies to probe photopic cortical temporal sensitivity. This fMRI study investigates flicker sensitivity under photopic and scotopic conditions across the cortical visual hierarchy. Methods: Fourteen participants viewed a stimulus flickering at six frequencies (2-10 Hz) under photopic and scotopic conditions during fMRI scanning. Retinotopic and high-level visual areas were delineated for each subject with population receptive field modeling (using a drifting bar) and a functional localizer (using images of objects). Results: In most areas, higher mean activation was observed under photopic than under scotopic conditions. However, peak activation was higher only in V1 and ventral retinotopic areas. The pattern of change over frequencies differed between lighting conditions in retinotopic areas, but not in most high-level areas. Under scotopic conditions, the largest BOLD response was observed at low frequencies throughout visual cortex. Under photopic conditions, BOLD responses appeared largely unchanging across frequencies, with a trend towards preferring higher frequencies in V1. Conclusions: Selectivity for lower frequencies under scotopic conditions was observed throughout visual cortex, in contrast to limited selectivity under photopic conditions. This low-frequency preference could allow more time for extracting information from sparse scotopic stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.