ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2025
Development, Validation, and Testing of a Simple Risk Score System Incorporating Routine Clinical and Laboratory Variables to Predict Moderate-to-Severe Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesEarly prediction is crucial for cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI). We aimed to develop and validate a simple, clinical- and laboratory-based risk score system for better CSA-AKI prediction.
methodsWe developed a new pre-operative risk score system for moderate-to-severe CSA-AKI in a 10-year cohort of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting at one tertiary centre. Most predictive laboratory and clinical variables were identified and constituted a simple and a full model. External testing was performed in patients at another centre. The risk score system was compared with 2 established clinical models.
resultsThe overall cohort comprised 27 534, 6403, and 1733 patients with moderate-to-severe CSA-AKI rates of 3.3%, 2.8%, and 8.4% for training, validation, and external testing, respectively. A simple 6-variable AB2C-S2 score (Age, Biomarkers of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and haemoglobin, Clinical history of preoperative critical state, Surgical factors of isolated surgery and on-pump surgery) and a full 9-variable AB2C2-S4 score (AB2C-S2 score plus hypertension, urgent surgery, and previous surgery) were developed. The simple model achieved similar performance as the full model in validation (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.78 vs 0.79, P = .37) and external testing (AUC 0.74 vs 0.75, P = .17), and both significantly outperformed than 2 established clinical models: Cleveland Clinic model (validation: AUC 0.71, external testing: AUC 0.65, all P < .001) and Ng model (validation: AUC 0.64, external testing: AUC 0.65, all P < .001).
conclusionsA simple preoperative risk score system for moderate-to-severe CSA-AKI was developed and outperformed established complex clinical models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.