Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40905606›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics2026

Pharmacokinetics of Ampicillin Trihydrate in Plasma, Interstitial, and Peritoneal Fluid Following Intraperitoneal or Intramuscular Administration in Steers at the Beginning of a Standing Flank Laparotomy.

Danielle A Mzyk, Jennifer L Halleran, Laura M Neumann, Ronald E Baynes, Derek M Foster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danielle A MzykDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9834-2089
Jennifer L HalleranDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Laura M NeumannDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Ronald E BaynesDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Derek M FosterDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Food Animal Residue Avoidance Databank at NC State UniversityUSDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2023-41480-41037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prophylactic and perioperative use of antibiotics is common prior to abdominal surgery in cattle for minimizing the risk of postoperative infections. Yet, there is little information on drug concentrations at sites of potential infections following surgical procedures. The objective of this study was to compare the concentrations in the plasma, peritoneal fluid, and interstitial fluid of ampicillin trihydrate in cattle. In a randomized design, ampicillin trihydrate, a β-lactam antibiotic, was administered to 12 healthy Holstein-Friesian steers intraoperatively via intraperitoneal (IP; n = 6) or intramuscular (IM; n = 6) injection in the cervical neck muscles at 11 mg/kg for both groups. For IP administration, ampicillin trihydrate was deposited into the abdominal cavity following an incision in the right paralumbar fossa. Steers in the IM group were administered ampicillin prior to surgical closure. Peritoneal fluid and interstitial fluid were collected using ultrafiltration probes. IP administration achieved higher concentrations in peritoneal fluid as compared to IM administration. Maximum plasma concentrations were significantly higher following IP administration (3.11 ± 2.5 μg/mL; p < 0.004) compared to the IM group (0.05 ± 10.9 μg/mL). Despite high peritoneal fluid concentrations of ampicillin, the variability in critical pharmacokinetic parameters following IP administration raises concerns about its therapeutic reliability. The correlation between intraperitoneal drug concentrations and clinical efficacy warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

AmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAscitic FluidExtracellular FluidLaparotomyAnimalsCattleInjections, IntramuscularInjections, IntraperitonealMaleAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial Agentsampicillincattleinterstitialintraperitonealpharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID40905606
PMCPMC12796777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.