ArticlePediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society
Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and birth records in a Japanese administrative claims database for pediatric patients.
Article in Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term medical support after definitive surgery for esophageal atresia: analysis using a national inpatient database in Japan.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Spatial analysis of cross-boundary hospitalizations of very low birth weight infants in Japan.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Outcomes of early-phase ampicillin plus aminoglycosides versus ampicillin plus cefotaxime for preterm infants.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and birth records in a Japanese administrative claims database for pediatric patients.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric SocietyArticle
- Trends in procedural closure of patent ductus arteriosus among children from 2011 to 2022 in Japan.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdministrative claims data are used in clinical studies; however, recorded diagnoses and procedures have not been fully validated for pediatric patients. We aimed to examine the validity of recorded information on pediatric patients in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database, a national inpatient database that includes administrative claims data.
methodsWe validated the DPC data using medical charts as the reference standard. We included patients aged <16 years admitted to a single academic hospital in Tokyo between 2018 and 2022. Positive predictive values were assessed for six diagnoses (cardiac arrest, blood cancer, acute myocarditis, nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, and trisomy 21) and in-hospital death. We evaluated intubation, mechanical ventilation, and high-flow nasal cannulas in 100 randomly selected patients from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and pediatric intensive care unit, and the gestational age and birth weight in NICU patients.
resultsThe positive predictive values of the diagnoses ranged from 70% (non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage) to 100% (trisomy 21 and in-hospital death). The sensitivities of the procedures ranged from 36% (high-flow nasal cannula in the NICU) to 89% (mechanical ventilation in the NICU), and the specificities were all >95%. The mean gestational ages were 34.2 weeks in the chart and 33.8 weeks in the claims, and the mean birth weights were 2101 g in the chart and 2104 g in the claims, demonstrating high concordance.
conclusionJapanese claims data can be useful for pediatric studies focusing on selected diagnoses, procedures, and birth records with confirmed validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.