ReviewEuropean heart journal2025
Decline in glomerular filtration rate as an endpoint in heart failure clinical trials: challenges and solutions.
Review in European heart journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practical Implementation of Steroidal and Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in the Management of Heart Failure.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Integrative Multi-Omics Profiling of Dynamic Body Mass Index-Systolic Blood Pressure Trajectories in Obesity for Precision Risk Stratification of Heart Failure Subtypes.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition and Renal Outcome in Men and Women With Heart Failure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Cardiorenal Biomarkers and their Implications in Prognosis and Treatment Response of Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular disease are tightly interconnected, with common mechanisms that underlie the development and progression of both diseases, recently articulated into the framework of the cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome. CKD and heart failure commonly coexist in the same individual, with increasing evidence for common therapies in both disease states. It is valuable for patients, clinicians, and regulatory agencies to understand how to best assess CKD progression in patients with heart failure for evaluation of individual patients and as part of an endpoint for outcome trials. Given the relatively short duration of most heart failure outcome trials, early measures of CKD progression prior to the occurrence of clinical events of kidney replacement therapy would be desirable. Such surrogate measures include slowing of the decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline either computed as annualized mean change in GFR (GFR slope) or time to substantial declines in GFR by specified threshold percentages (40% or 50% GFR decline). Regulatory agencies accept these endpoints for full drug approval which has enabled progress in design and conduct of trials for CKD progression. Application of these endpoints in heart failure outcome trials has the potential for similar progress. However, an immediate reduction in GFR is common following initiation of several of the guideline directed therapy for heart failure. Understanding how to best interpret an immediate GFR reduction vs long term kidney benefit is critical to optimal assessment of endpoint in an outcome trial and in the use of these medications for management of patients with heart failure. Here, the intersection of heart failure and CKD is described, how GFR and its change over time are assessed in both individual patients and in interventional trials, the evidence supporting use of GFR changes as endpoints in CKD progression trials, and the challenges and possible solutions for the use of GFR as endpoint in heart failure outcome trials and for care of individual patients, guided by case studies to inform the discussion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.