Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40905446›Full record

SynthesisPersonality and mental health2025

Feasibility and Efficacy of Brief DBT Intervention for Adults With Borderline Personality Disorder/Traits: A Systematic Review.

Yujie Zhang, Spencer X Chen, Martina Smit, Alexander L Chapman

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Personality and mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yujie ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-1835-7189
Spencer X ChenDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5842-1153
Martina SmitDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Alexander L ChapmanDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard, comprehensive dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) has been well established as an effective and evidence-based treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD). As a comprehensive and longer term treatment (e.g., 6-12 months or more), DBT can be challenging to implement in resource-strapped public healthcare settings. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine existing literature to assess the efficacy and feasibility of abbreviated DBT programs (16 weeks or fewer in duration, no more than one group session per week). Literature searches yielded 22 studies (20 journal articles and 2 dissertations) meeting criteria for inclusion. Findings indicated that abbreviated forms of DBT are overall effective in improving symptoms of BPD, general psychiatric symptoms including depression and anxiety, and general functioning. Attrition rates varied widely (between 0% and 60%). Of note, the majority of studies reviewed were observational, had small sample sizes, and used varied outcome measures focusing on preintervention and postintervention symptom scores. In this article, we discuss the current state of the literature and suggest future directions for the efficient implementation of DBT.

Indexed as

Borderline Personality DisorderDialectical Behavior TherapyAdultFeasibility StudiesHumansborderline personality disorderdialectical behavior therapy

Identifiers

PMID40905446
PMCPMC12409768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.