ArticleGlobal health action2025
Community ownership of biopsychosocial model of care: a qualitative study in the Katana health district, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Article in Global health action, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe WHO recommends the Person-Centred Care approach, based on the biopsychosocial (BPS) model with community participation, to streamline the management of chronic diseases in Primary Health Care (PHC) activities and reduce their growing burden, even in Africa. The Democratic Republic of Congo's (DRC) experience of community participation in implementing the BPS model for chronic diseases has been little explored.
objectiveTo describe community ownership of the biopsychosocial model of chronic disease care in PHC facilities in South Kivu province, DRC.
methodsA basic interpretive qualitative study was conducted in April 2024, in three health areas of the Katana health district, among beneficiaries of chronic disease interventions. Nine in-depth interviews were conducted with care providers and community representatives, followed by two focus groups with community health workers (CHWs) and a document review. An inductive-deductive content analysis was carried out using ATLAS.ti 24 software.
resultsBased on the four main themes identified in the study, community ownership of the model depends on various factors (relational, organizational, and motivational/supportive). As perceptions, respondents recognized the model's application through partner support, meetings with community representatives and patient decision-making. Community involvement in the model was observed through participatory meetings, reinforced home visits, psycho-education, and club solidarity. Significant challenges included the lack of training for providers and CHWs, CHW's financial demotivation, poor dissemination of model, and patient poverty. Proposed strategies included a participatory stakeholder audit, capacity-building on the model, psychologist availability, and income-generating activities to motivate CHWs.
conclusionsCommunity ownership of the BPS model is a vital pillar to support effective and resilient chronic disease management, rationalizing it in PHC for better health outcomes. Healthcare systems should consider these identified factors in the policy definition and rationalization process for these diseases by establishing effective coordination mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.