ArticleCancer medicine2025
Gender Medicine in Computed Tomography Radiomics Analysis to Predict Disease Progression in Liver Respectable Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGender medicine is an evolving discipline that examines how diseases manifest and progress differently in men and women. Tailoring medical therapies and diagnostic approaches can enhance patient outcomes. While radiomics is emerging as a promising tool in personalized medicine, few studies evaluate its role in gender medicine within radiology. In this context, our preliminary objective was to determine whether radiomic features could predict disease-free survival within 3 years after the last follow-up in patients with colorectal liver metastases, with an emphasis on gender differences.
methodsThe study analyzed preoperative CT scans of 196 patients from The Cancer Imaging Archive who underwent resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Using the Pyradiomics library, we extracted 1316 features for each patient. We developed an analysis framework applied initially to the entire patient sample, then separately to male and female subsamples. This framework included: Volume of Interest (VOI) segmentation, handcrafted feature extraction and selection, detection of confounding patients, and training of ensemble classification models comprising five classifiers. Performance was assessed through 100 rounds of 10-fold cross-validation.
resultsThe selected feature subsets for male and female subsamples showed no overlap. The ensemble model demonstrated a notable improvement in performance when trained on the female subsample (mean AUC of 80.5%) compared to the model trained on the entire dataset (mean AUC of 64.8%), while performance for the male subsample remained nearly unchanged.
conclusionAlthough further validation with a larger dataset and external confirmation is needed, these preliminary results suggest a meaningful impact of gender medicine in radiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.