ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2025
Diagnostic Impasse and Wandering in Patients With Rare Neuromuscular Diseases: Insights Into Patient Characteristics From the French National Network for Rare Neuromuscular Diseases (FILNEMUS) and the French National Rare Disease Database (BNDMR).
Article in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiagnostic wandering and impasse are major challenges for rare disease management. This study describes the characteristics of patients with rare neuromuscular diseases (RNMDs) without a diagnosis being managed by the French national network for RNMDs (FILNEMUS).
methodsData for RNMD patients managed by FILNEMUS centers between January 2017 and November 2022 were extracted from the French National Rare Disease Database (BNDMR). A network-wide, standardized, and quality-controlled process was established to collect additional data for patients without a diagnosis. The demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of these patients were then compared with patients with a confirmed diagnosis.
results13.5% of patients evaluated (n = 5696/42,256) had no confirmed diagnosis. Comparison with 25,682 managed in the same centers and during the same periods with a confirmed diagnosis revealed that socioeconomic characteristics and region of residence did not influence diagnostic status. However, lack of a confirmed diagnosis was more common in patients aged > 50 years, and older patients had longer periods between first symptom onset and first interaction with an expert center. Evaluation of medical records identified eight RNMDs associated with increased risk of diagnostic wandering and impasse.
conclusionsThe FILNEMUS national network of expert centers has enabled equality of care for RNMD patients across France, but further measures are needed to promote more rapid referral to these centers, reduce times to first consultation, and maintain patient engagement in the diagnostic process, particularly for later-onset RNMDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.