SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026
Autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction results in improved graft synovial coverage and stability, while remnant-preserving techniques further enhance synovialization: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation Between Synovial Coverage of the Reconstructed Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Healing of Bucket-Handle Medial Meniscal Tears After Combined ACL Reconstruction and Meniscal Repair.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Assessment of a new technique for biological augmentation in sternoclavicular joint dislocations: a cadaveric feasibility and biomechanical evaluation.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Structural severity versus clinical reality: Are we measuring the right endpoints?Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare graft synovialization and tear rates between autograft and allograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction based upon second-look arthroscopy (SLA), along with joint stability, subjective and objective clinical outcomes.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was conducted on 7 March 2025, to identify studies reporting graft synovial coverage and tear rates on SLA following primary ACL reconstruction. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model with logit transformation. Study weights were calculated via the inverse variance method. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and the I² statistic. Forest plots were created to display individual and pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals.
resultsA total of 26 clinical studies comprising 2891 patients were included in this systematic review. Of these, 2164 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with autografts and 727 with allografts. SLA was performed in 2009 patients, including 1570 in the autograft group (78.1%) and 481 in the allograft group (23.9%). Good synovial coverage (>50% of the graft) was observed in 1303 autograft cases (83%) and 341 allograft cases (70.9%) (p < 0.001). Poor synovial coverage (<50%) was seen in 146 autografts (9.3%) and 93 allografts (19.3%) (p < 0.001). Torn grafts were found in 125 autografts (8%) and 25 allografts (10%) (n.s.). No significant differences in synovial coverage or graft tear rates were observed when comparing single bundle versus double bundle ACL reconstructions. Mean anterior tibial translation was significantly lower in the autograft group compared to the allograft group (1.23 ± 0.68 vs. 2.00 ± 0.38 mm; p < 0.001). No significant differences were noted in postoperative Lachman (n.s.) and pivot shift tests (n.s.), or in subjective outcomes based on Lysholm (p = 0.05) and Tegner scores (n.s.). However, significantly more patients in the autograft group achieved normal (A) or nearly normal (B) International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) objective scores (p = 0.02), whereas higher rates of abnormal or severely abnormal (grades C and D) IKDC scores were observed in the allograft group (p < 0.001). Remnant-preserving ACL reconstruction resulted in significantly better synovial coverage, fewer graft tears and improved knee stability compared to conventional ACL reconstruction (all p < 0.001), with no difference in cyclops lesion incidence (n.s.).
conclusionsAutograft ACL reconstruction showed superior synovial coverage, lower retear and failure rates, reduced anterior tibial translation and better IKDC objective scores compared to allografts. Remnant-preserving techniques further enhanced synovial coverage, lowered graft tear rates and improved joint stability. No significant differences in synovial coverage, graft tears or failure rates were observed between single bundle and double bundle ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review and meta-analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.