ArticleEuropean journal of translational myology2025
Validation of the Bulgarian versions of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G: reliability, construct validity, and agreement in cancer survivors.
Article in European journal of translational myology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a critical outcome measure in oncology research and clinical care. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically validate the Bulgarian versions of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), focusing on Internal Consistency (IC), Test-Retest Reliability (TRR), and Construct Validity (CV) in Cancer Survivors (CS) diagnosed with breast, lung, or colorectal cancer. A total of 235 Bulgarian CS (mean age 62.3 ± 11.2 years; 118 males, 117 females) were recruited from five tertiary care hospitals in a cross-sectional study design. The EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G were translated and culturally adapted according to the official EORTC and FACIT guidelines. Psychometric evaluation included data quality (floor and ceiling effects, missing responses), IC, TRR, and CV assessed via convergent and Discriminant Validity (DV). A subsample of 78 study participants (33.2%) completed both questionnaires twice over a 14-day interval for TRR assessment. CV was supported by strong item-scale and cross-instrument correlations (r = 0.62-0.81). IC was excellent across all domains (Cronbach's α = 0.88-0.95), and TRR demonstrated high stability (ICC = 0.75-0.89). Bland-Altman analysis showed acceptable agreement, with a mean difference of 23.20 (95% CI: 21.87-24.53) and limits of agreement ranging from +3.77 to +42.63. Minimal Floor Effects (FE) were observed, while Ceiling Effects (CE) were noted in specific domains (e.g., Social Functioning (SF) and Global Health (GH) in the EORTC QLQ-C30; Social Well-Being (SWB) and Emotional Well-Being (EWB) in the FACT-G). The findings support that the Bulgarian versions of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G are valid, reliable, and culturally appropriate instruments for evaluating HRQoL in Bulgarian CS. Their use is recommended in both clinical practice and research contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.