ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026
Thresholds for minimum clinically important difference, minimal important change and patient acceptable symptom state for the ACL-RSI and the K-SES in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current concepts and future perspective of muscle function tests to inform return to sport decision-making after ACLR: A narrative review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to calculate and provide Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds, Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID), and Minimal Important Change (MIC) values for the ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale and the Knee Self-Efficacy Scale (K-SES) in patients treated with ACL reconstruction.
methodData were extracted from a rehabilitation specific registry, Project ACL. The registry prospectively collects patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PASS, MCID and MIC were calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and anchor-based methods. Calculations were made for patients who completed the ACL-RSI and K-SES
resultsA total of 704 patients aged 15-50 year, who underwent ACL reconstruction were included. The PASS thresholds increased over time, with AUC values indicating acceptable discrimination at all follow-ups, especially at 18 months. The MCID values ranged from 1.6 to 4.1 for the K-SES
conclusionThe PASS, MCID and MIC values for the K-SES LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.