ArticleBiology open2025
Giving their all for their offspring: physiological trade-offs in an Andean-Patagonian viviparous lizard in response to global warming.
Article in Biology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global warming threatens biodiversity, particularly affecting ectothermic animals, which must seek refuge to avoid overheating when ambient temperatures exceed their critical thresholds. Extended shelter use limits the time for essential activities such as foraging, social interactions, and reproduction, potentially reducing survival and increasing local extinction risk. Viviparous Liolaemids inhabiting cold-temperate Andean regions are considered vulnerable to rising temperatures and are predicted to experience local extinctions this century. We evaluated the effects of thermal restriction on pregnancy outcomes and offspring in the viviparous lizard Liolaemus pictus under two conditions. One group of pregnant females experienced simulated future thermal restrictions (restriction group, RG; n=12), while another group experienced identical laboratory conditions without thermal restrictions (no-restriction group, NRG; n=14). In RG females, 41.7% were removed due to feeding cessation or spontaneous abortions (versus 12.3% in NRG), reflecting the consequences of thermal restriction. The remaining RG females selected lower preferred body temperatures after 2 weeks of experimentation and maintained a stable body condition throughout pregnancy. However, both groups of offspring showed similar body condition and locomotor performance, suggesting physiological compensation by RG females. This physiological plasticity of L. pictus may help buffer the adverse effects of global warming on reproductive success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.