ReviewHaematologica2026
What's hidden in plain sight? Impact of clonal hematopoiesis on the risk and progression of nonhematologic cancers.
Review in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Introduction to the Review Series. Clonal hematopoiesis review series - from biology to clinical management.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Impact of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential on Treatment Response and Tumor Microenvironment in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2026Article
- Circulating tumor DNA-guided early detection and minimal residual disease monitoring in pancreatic and biliary cancers: evidence, barriers, and opportunities.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is a frequently observed phenomenon in aging individuals without apparent illness and exhibits an increased prevalence in cancer patients. Mechanistic studies indicate that mutant immune cells alter the tumor microenvironment, leading to increased inflammation, blood vessel formation, and immune cell exhaustion. Paradoxically, these changes also preserve stem-like T-cell pools that can be utilized by immunotherapy. CH may be incidentally detected in patients whose solid tumors are profiled by next-generation sequencing. Clinically, CH confers higher risks of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, cardiovascular and inflammatory toxicities, and context-specific changes in treatment efficacy. Moreover, tumor-infiltrating CH independently shortens survival. Two validated risk scores can inform the risk for myeloid malignancy, yet surveillance, cardiometabolic management, and regimen selection still primarily rely on expert consensus. Because CH may be discovered incidentally, rigorous confirmation of variant origin when CH is suspected is essential to avoid misdirected therapy. We propose a pragmatic approach: (i) confirm CH with paired blood sequencing when feasible; (ii) integrate high-risk features into risk stratification, counseling, and monitoring for cytopenias and cardiovascular events; and (iii) prefer less genotoxic regimens when the oncologic benefit is comparable. Early trials blocking interleukin-1β suggest that targeting inflammation driven by CH may improve outcomes in patients with solid tumors. Prospective studies informed by mutation analysis and tracking clonal changes and inflammatory markers are needed to determine whether routine CH assessment can be integrated into precision oncology to improve outcomes for patients with solid tumors and CH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.