ArticleHaematologica2026
Genetic risk classification in acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with hematopoietic cell transplantation and post-transplant cyclophosphamide.
Article in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We analyzed the outcomes of 217 acute myeloid leukemia patients in complete remission who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with myeloablative conditioning and post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graftversus- host disease prophylaxis, aiming to assess the prognostic significance of genetic risk categories. In the overall cohort, the 2-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 77% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71-83) and 72% (95% CI: 66-78), respectively. European LeukemiaNet (ELN)2022 risk stratification lacked prognostic value in HCT. Instead, we identified four risk categories with distinct impact on OS: standard risk (ELN2022 favorable/intermediate and adverse risk without high-risk genetic risk under the defined subcategories), intermediate risk (≥2 myelodysplasia-related gene mutations) (hazard ratio [HR]=2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-4.92), adverse risk (complex karyotype, monosomal karyotype, inv(3)/t(3;3), KMT2A rearrangement) (HR=4.24; 95% CI: 2.00-9.02), and very adverse risk (TP53 mutations) (HR=6.81; 95% CI: 3.00-15.5). These categories demonstrated similar predictive power for EFS and cumulative incidence of relapse. Moreover, integrating pre-transplant measurable residual disease (MRD) refined risk stratification, identified MRD-negative patients with ≥2 myelodysplasia-related gene mutations whose OS and EFS were comparable to standard-risk patients. This refined classification improves the prognostic value of ELN2022 for acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic HCT with modern platform by integrating genetic features and MRD status to better guide post-transplant management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.