Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40905083›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2026

Infection risk in 158 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with bispecific antibodies: a single-center experience.

Lorenzo Cani, Sara A Scott, Danielle Roberts, Nisha S Joseph, Craig C Hofmeister, Vikas A Gupta, Madhav V Dhodapkar, Sagar Lonial, Ajay K Nooka, Jonathan L Kaufman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lorenzo CaniDivision of Hematology, AOU Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Torino and Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Torino, Italy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA. lorenzocani1@outlook.it.
Sara A ScottEmory Healthcare, Atlanta, GA.
Danielle RobertsWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Nisha S JosephWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Craig C HofmeisterWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Vikas A GuptaWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Madhav V DhodapkarWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Sagar LonialWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Ajay K NookaWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Jonathan L KaufmanWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four bispecific antibodies (BsAb) are approved for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), but their use is associated with infection risks, requiring mitigation strategies. This single-center retrospective study evaluated the incidence, etiology, and risk factors for infections in 158 RRMM patients treated with BsAb. A total of 101 patients received BCMAxCD3 BsAb (teclistamab and elranatamab), and 57 GPRC5DxCD3 BsAb (talquetamab). Prophylactic measures included herpes zoster and Pneumocystis jirovecii coverage, along with monthly intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) as primary prophylaxis. Tocilizumab was used for the prevention of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and BsAb frequency was reduced in responding patients. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load was assessed monthly. Median follow-up was 6.1 versus 4.5 months for anti-BCMA versus anti-GPRC5D group. The cumulative incidence of the first any-grade infection at 5 and 10 months was 38.6% and 47.9% in the anti-BCMA group, and 28.1% and 30.3% in the anti-GPRC5D group (P=0.06). IVIG administration significantly reduced the risk of grade ≥3 infections in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio =0.38; P<0.01). Most infections were viral (60%), mainly upper respiratory (38%). The cumulative incidence of CMV infections at 5 and 10 months was 45.1% and 48% in the anti-BCMA group, versus 27.3% at both time points in the anti-GPRC5D group (P=0.03). With the limitation of a short follow-up, our results showed a higher incidence of anygrade infections in patients receiving anti-BCMA BsAb. Primary IVIG prophylaxis reduced severe infections. CMV infections were more frequent in patients treated with anti-BCMA agents.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalInfectionsMultiple MyelomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAntibodies, BispecificAntineoplastic Agents, Immunological

Identifiers

PMID40905083
PMCPMC12862324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.