ArticleHaematologica2026
Infection risk in 158 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with bispecific antibodies: a single-center experience.
Article in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Infectious toxicities associated with bispecific antibodies and CAR-T Cells in multiple myeloma: a systematic review.Annals of hematology · 2026Pooled it
- Real-world incidence of severe infections in multiple myeloma patients receiving bispecific antibodies: a meta-analysis.Annals of hematology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and specific toxicity profiles of GPRC5D- versus BCMA-targeted bispecific antibodies in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of clinical trials and real-world studies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Cytomegalovirus infection in patients receiving bispecific antibodies for multiple myeloma and B-cell malignancies: a single-center cohort and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Infection in Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Bispecific Antibodies.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- [Chinese expert consensus on infection management in multiple myeloma patients treated with bispecific antibody (2026)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Article
- Bispecific Antibodies: Strategies Available to Optimize Their Safe Delivery in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Outpatient step-up dosing of bispecific antibodies in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: an oncology nursing framework for monitoring and supportive care.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Bispecific Antibodies in Hematologic Malignancies in the Outpatient and Community Settings.Advances in hematology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Four bispecific antibodies (BsAb) are approved for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), but their use is associated with infection risks, requiring mitigation strategies. This single-center retrospective study evaluated the incidence, etiology, and risk factors for infections in 158 RRMM patients treated with BsAb. A total of 101 patients received BCMAxCD3 BsAb (teclistamab and elranatamab), and 57 GPRC5DxCD3 BsAb (talquetamab). Prophylactic measures included herpes zoster and Pneumocystis jirovecii coverage, along with monthly intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) as primary prophylaxis. Tocilizumab was used for the prevention of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and BsAb frequency was reduced in responding patients. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load was assessed monthly. Median follow-up was 6.1 versus 4.5 months for anti-BCMA versus anti-GPRC5D group. The cumulative incidence of the first any-grade infection at 5 and 10 months was 38.6% and 47.9% in the anti-BCMA group, and 28.1% and 30.3% in the anti-GPRC5D group (P=0.06). IVIG administration significantly reduced the risk of grade ≥3 infections in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio =0.38; P<0.01). Most infections were viral (60%), mainly upper respiratory (38%). The cumulative incidence of CMV infections at 5 and 10 months was 45.1% and 48% in the anti-BCMA group, versus 27.3% at both time points in the anti-GPRC5D group (P=0.03). With the limitation of a short follow-up, our results showed a higher incidence of anygrade infections in patients receiving anti-BCMA BsAb. Primary IVIG prophylaxis reduced severe infections. CMV infections were more frequent in patients treated with anti-BCMA agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.