Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40905050›Full record

ReviewGut and liver2025

Clinical Application of Lyon Consensus 2.0 in Asia: An Overview.

Ming-Wun Wong, Chien-Lin Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut and liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ming-Wun WongDepartment of Medicine, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0676-6800
Chien-Lin ChenDepartment of Medicine, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9084-8210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Lyon Consensus 2.0, published in 2023, provides an updated diagnostic framework for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), emphasizing objective physiological testing and introducing the concept of "actionable GERD" to guide individualized therapy. This review evaluates the clinical applicability of this framework in Asia, where normative values require regional adaptation. Given limited access to physiological testing in primary care, an endoscopy-based strategy may be considered due to its greater availability, helping overcome diagnostic barriers. Key updates include recognizing Los Angeles grade B esophagitis as conclusive GERD evidence, adoption of prolonged wireless pH monitoring, and revised thresholds for pH-impedance studies, including mean nocturnal baseline impedance. High-resolution manometry and impedance remain important for evaluating refractory symptoms and regurgitation-predominant presentations. Challenges in Asian contexts include the limited predictive performance of Western-derived tools, such as the Lyon score, and the need for lower acid exposure thresholds. The Milan score, a novel manometry-based index, provides an assessment of anti-reflux barrier integrity and may guide selection of candidates for endoscopic anti-reflux therapies. The COuGH RefluX score, based on symptoms and risk factors, estimates GERD probability in patients with laryngeal complaints. Incorporating psychophysiological assessments, such as esophageal hypervigilance and symptom-related anxiety, can further enhance diagnostic precision and improve outcomes. Successful implementation of Lyon Consensus 2.0 in Asia will depend on contextual adaptation of diagnostic criteria and integration of accessible clinical and psychological tools.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal RefluxAsiaConsensusElectric ImpedanceEsophageal pH MonitoringHumansManometryPractice Guidelines as TopicGastroesophageal refluxManometryPractice guidelinesPsychophysiologyRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID40905050
PMCPMC12436056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.