ReviewGut and liver2025
Evolving Strategies for the Optimal Management of Common Bile Duct Stones.
Review in Gut and liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary suture versus ERCP combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a retrospective comparative study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- The role and advantages of intraductal ultrasound for the management of gallstones.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of common bile duct (CBD) stones has evolved substantially with the advent of endoscopic techniques and dedicated high-end devices. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become a widespread essential technique for managing CBD stones, with high success rates in standard cases. However, for patients with large stones, stones in an impacted state, and stones in anatomically challenging regions, advanced strategies using various dedicated devices may be needed. Although mechanical lithotripsy and endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation are effective techniques for managing giant stones, temporary biliary stenting with interval stone extraction, commonly referred to as two-stage ERCP, is a valuable approach, particularly in patients with sepsis or significant comorbidities. Digital single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC) combined with electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy has significantly transformed the endoscopic treatment strategy for managing difficult-to-extract stones by enabling direct visualization of stones and real-time targeted fragmentation. In very difficult situations where conventional ERCP is unsuccessful, percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy may be an effective solution, with DSOC enhancing both efficacy and safety. Advances in endoscopic technology, including integrated laser systems and next-generation retrieval devices, are expected to further improve procedural outcomes. Artificial intelligence is also gaining traction, with potential applications in diagnostic imaging interpretation, intraprocedural decision support, and prediction of stone recurrence. In conclusion, optimal management of CBD stones requires a patient specific, resource-sensitive approach. The integration of cutting-edge technologies and data-driven strategies is expected to improve the precision, efficiency, and overall quality of endoscopic CBD stone management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.