Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904977›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Maternal Anemia as a Predictor of Anemia in the Child in Nepal: An Analysis of the Demographic and Health Survey.

Yasutaka Kuniyoshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yasutaka KuniyoshiDepartment of Social Services and Healthcare Management, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the extent to which maternal anemia predicts anemia in the child. This secondary data analysis used the Nepal Demographic and Health Survey datasets from 2011, 2016, and 2022. The study included children aged six to 59 months of age and their mothers from households eligible for blood testing. We performed multiple logistic regression analyses to determine adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for the association between maternal anemia and anemia in the child. We used the child's age, gender, birth as a twin, birth order, and body mass index (BMI), as well as maternal age, BMI, education level, wealth index, and place of residence as variables for adjustment covariates. We used eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to develop the prediction model for anemia in the child. We utilized the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to explain the importance of predictors. Children with moderate-to-severe anemia (hemoglobin level <10.0 g/dL) accounted for 21% of the studied population. Maternal anemia demonstrated a positive association with anemia in the child (adjusted OR: 2.26; 95% confidence interval: 1.84-2.76). It demonstrated the second most substantial effect on the prediction model, succeeding the child's age, within the SHAP framework for the XGBoost model. Higher maternal hemoglobin levels (g/dL) were associated with a lower likelihood of anemia in the child, shifting the prediction toward nonanemic status. Maternal anemia is thus a significant predictor of anemia in the child. Determining the presence of anemia in the child may be important in instances where the mother is diagnosed with anemia. Comprehensive interventions targeting mothers and the entire household may be indispensable in ameliorating anemia in children from a public health perspective.

Indexed as

anemiaanemia in the childhemoglobin levelmachine learningmaternal anemianepal demographic health surveyshap

Identifiers

PMID40904977
PMCPMC12402669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.